Creador de graffitis online dating

11-Dec-2017 14:56

It was all pretty basic and lacking a hook to really draw a reader it. I just couldn't keep my head in the book when the writing was so uninspiring. Fun plot and Lucy finally became interesting by the middle of the book.Then again, this was mostly a romance, not a suspense. She felt pretty blah to me in the beginning for some weird reason.Anyway, the plot is simple but it also hung together pretty well and made sense. And the relationship worked for me as Quinn and Lucy fit very well together and I enjoyed their romance.So this may have rated the five stars even without the sense of relief of coming from a string of samey badreads.And while I thought Quinn was a bit obtuse in thinking Lucy might be the killer because she wrote so evocatively I had to remind myself that a lot of people don't understand how writers work and that Ah, the trials of online dating in the 2006 frontier.And while I thought Quinn was a bit obtuse in thinking Lucy might be the killer because she wrote so evocatively I had to remind myself that a lot of people don't understand how writers work and that it's literally to think things through that most people don't even consider.The primitive matchups made a good backdrop for this pseudo-suspense romance.Although the story was kind of basic, I found myself intrigued by the dynamic of two people dating undercover, one for research for her book, the other a cop on a case.

I felt like I could connect with these two characters almost instantly and the chemistry between them were so hot. LOLThe further I got into the story, the more it kept getting better and better until I was completely wrapped up in this and it became apparent that I couldn’t stop turning page after page until late into the night! At times it made me want to bash my head against a wall. Gibson had this awful habit of describing each and everything thing a character did.It helps, of course, that both are lovely in their own right, but that they just felt so right together is no small thing, either.Which is to say that I really enjoyed reading this and found it a delight but have to acknowledge that at least part of that may be in contrast to a string of hard reading that proceed it.It was all pretty basi I can't particularly think of much good to say about this book. He set his files and computer on the kitchen table and turned on the lights as they moved down the hall to the spare room. There were so many scenes like that in the books..did this, he did that, she did this, she did that. And even so, her sentence struture had no variety or complexity in these scenes.I wouldn't say it was downright horribly bad...well, maybe not. The plot isn't exactly original - A serial killer meeting victims online. Which isn't a bad thing, necessarily, if the author can make their work stand-out from the rest, but for this book, there was nothing to this storyline to separate it from anything else out there. There are so many better ways to convey scenes like that. I read one of her books before, and I remember enjoying it, but that was over a year ago, and I wasn't quiet so critical then.3.5 stars.

I felt like I could connect with these two characters almost instantly and the chemistry between them were so hot. LOLThe further I got into the story, the more it kept getting better and better until I was completely wrapped up in this and it became apparent that I couldn’t stop turning page after page until late into the night! At times it made me want to bash my head against a wall. Gibson had this awful habit of describing each and everything thing a character did.It helps, of course, that both are lovely in their own right, but that they just felt so right together is no small thing, either.Which is to say that I really enjoyed reading this and found it a delight but have to acknowledge that at least part of that may be in contrast to a string of hard reading that proceed it.It was all pretty basi I can't particularly think of much good to say about this book. He set his files and computer on the kitchen table and turned on the lights as they moved down the hall to the spare room. There were so many scenes like that in the books..did this, he did that, she did this, she did that. And even so, her sentence struture had no variety or complexity in these scenes.I wouldn't say it was downright horribly bad...well, maybe not. The plot isn't exactly original - A serial killer meeting victims online. Which isn't a bad thing, necessarily, if the author can make their work stand-out from the rest, but for this book, there was nothing to this storyline to separate it from anything else out there. There are so many better ways to convey scenes like that. I read one of her books before, and I remember enjoying it, but that was over a year ago, and I wasn't quiet so critical then.3.5 stars.And I liked how the conflict between necessity and need worked and the interactions/reactions as a result.